Children learning together in an outdoor classroom in the woods

Milwaukee · Proposed public charter · 2027

Shrink the system.
Not childhood.

A modern village where personalized academics create more room for play, nature, meaningful work, and the relationships children need.

I want to be part of this Planning a 75-student K4–2 pilot
Concept visualization

The false choice

Rigor
or childhood?

Families should not have to choose.

Strong academics A healthy childhood

Understory is designed for both.

The operating model

The advantage
is the system.

Technology works quietly in the background—recovering time and money for what only people can do.

01

Personalize

Right lesson. Right moment.

02

Simplify

Fewer administrative layers.

03

Reinvest

Play. Nature. Meaningful work.

04

Prove

Evidence-backed growth.

More childhood. More evidence. Lower overhead.

Concept visualization of an Understory campus among trees

A modern village for learning

The classroom
doesn’t end at the door.

Small learning communities connected to woods, gardens, shared tables, and places to make something real.

Concept visualization

Why this is different

Three advantages.
One better childhood.

This is not a technology-first school. It is a childhood-first school made possible by better tools.

01 · ADMIN-LIGHT

More of every dollar reaches the child.

Fewer layers and shared services direct resources toward educators, experiences, and learning.

02 · PLAY-CENTERED

Play is how children become capable.

Nature, movement, risk, food, friendship, and independence are part of the school day—not rewards after it.

03 · EVIDENCE-RICH

Whole-child growth becomes visible.

One consistent 1–100 language combines benchmarks, observations, portfolios, and reflection.

A day at The Understory

A day built around how children grow.

Five rhythms. One whole child.

  1. 01Nature + connection
  2. 02Personalized academics
  3. 03Projects + making
  4. 04Food + movement
  5. 05Reflection + real-world work

The Understory Growth Map

Growth,
made visible.

Grades answer, “Did they complete the work?” Families deserve to know, “How is my child growing—and what comes next?”

01 One 1–100 language across the whole child

02 Every score tied to visible evidence

03 Every update ends with a next step

Illustrative sample · not student data

Maya R. · K5 · Winter 2027

+12whole-child
growth
September profile 65Current profile 77

Three growth highlights

Mind +14 Explains reasoning and revises independently.Self +18 Recovers from frustration and returns to the work.Creativity +12 Tests multiple approaches and improves the design.
MindExtending68 82 +14
Baseline 68Target 86

How a child understands, reasons, and learns.

BodyApplying65 74 +9
Baseline 65Target 79

How a child builds physical confidence and healthy daily rhythms.

SelfApplying60 78 +18
Baseline 60Target 82

How a child understands, manages, and directs themselves.

OthersExtending74 81 +7
Baseline 74Target 85

How a child builds trust and contributes with other people.

WorldApplying58 69 +11
Baseline 58Target 75

How a child understands their place and acts with responsibility.

CreativityApplying67 79 +12
Baseline 67Target 84

How a child imagines, makes, experiments, and improves original work.

Next-cycle priorityWorld · 69 → 75

Use field observations to propose one realistic improvement for a shared community place.

What the six dimensions mean

A fuller picture of a growing child.

These are six parts of one child—not six separate grades. Each score summarizes demonstrated growth against age- and grade-specific rubric anchors.

01MindExtending

How a child understands, reasons, and learns.

Baseline68Current82Next target86

Subskills behind the score

Reading comprehension84
Mathematical reasoning80
Written expression76
Problem solving86
Attention + planning81

What educators look for

Literacy · numeracy · problem solving · attention · planning · learning strategies

What we observed

Explains ideas from text, shows the steps in mathematical reasoning, and independently revises after feedback.

Evidence reviewed

2 benchmarks · 4 work samples · 6 observations · 1 project rubric

May include: Reading and math benchmarks · writing and work samples · project rubrics · teacher observation.
Next step

Support conclusions with two specific pieces of evidence.

At home

Ask: “What evidence helped you reach that conclusion?”

Student voice

“I’m proud that I kept trying different ways until it made sense.”

02BodyApplying

How a child builds physical confidence and healthy daily rhythms.

Baseline65Current74Next target79

Subskills behind the score

Movement confidence78
Coordination72
Stamina69
Outdoor engagement83
Healthy routines70

What educators look for

Movement · coordination · stamina · outdoor engagement · safe risk · healthy routines

What we observed

Sustains active play for longer periods, navigates uneven terrain safely, and notices when the body needs rest or water.

Evidence reviewed

5 movement observations · 2 skill demonstrations · 4 reflections

May include: Movement observation · skill demonstrations · participation patterns · student goal reflections.
Next step

Build balance and pacing during longer, multi-step outdoor challenges.

At home

Invite Maya to plan the route and rest stops for a family walk.

Student voice

“I climbed farther because I stopped, looked, and tried again.”

03SelfApplying

How a child understands, manages, and directs themselves.

Baseline60Current78Next target82

Subskills behind the score

Self-awareness79
Emotional regulation75
Persistence84
Independence77
Follow-through76

What educators look for

Self-awareness · regulation · persistence · independence · initiative · follow-through

What we observed

Names frustration, selects a calming strategy, and returns to challenging work with less adult prompting.

Evidence reviewed

8 observations · 3 goal check-ins · 4 student reflections

May include: Teacher rubrics · student reflection · goal completion · learning and behavior notes.
Next step

Choose and track one independent goal across an entire week.

At home

Ask Maya to name the strategy she wants to use before a difficult task.

Student voice

“Taking a breath helps me get my brain ready again.”

04OthersExtending

How a child builds trust and contributes with other people.

Baseline74Current81Next target85

Subskills behind the score

Empathy84
Communication82
Collaboration79
Inclusion85
Conflict repair75

What educators look for

Empathy · communication · collaboration · inclusion · leadership · conflict repair

What we observed

Invites quieter peers into group work, listens to competing ideas, and helps the group reach a shared decision.

Evidence reviewed

6 collaboration rubrics · 3 peer responses · 5 observations

May include: Collaboration rubrics · peer feedback · teacher observation · community-circle reflection.
Next step

Practice naming the problem and proposing a repair after conflict.

At home

Use: “What happened, who was affected, and what could repair it?”

Student voice

“Our idea got better when everybody added something.”

05WorldApplying

How a child understands their place and acts with responsibility.

Baseline58Current69Next target75

Subskills behind the score

Curiosity78
Stewardship72
Real-world application66
Community knowledge63
Contribution68

What educators look for

Curiosity · stewardship · real-world application · community knowledge · contribution

What we observed

Asks strong questions during fieldwork and records careful observations, but still needs support connecting findings to community action.

Evidence reviewed

2 project artifacts · 3 fieldwork notes · 1 presentation · 1 partner response

May include: Project artifacts · fieldwork notes · exhibitions · presentations · partner feedback.
Next step

Use field observations to propose one realistic improvement for a shared place.

At home

Notice one neighborhood problem together and brainstorm three possible responses.

Student voice

“I want to make a sign so people know why the creek matters.”

06CreativityApplying

How a child imagines, makes, experiments, and improves original work.

Baseline67Current79Next target84

Subskills behind the score

Idea generation84
Expression80
Experimentation82
Design + making77
Revision73

What educators look for

Idea generation · expression · experimentation · design · revision · productive risk-taking

What we observed

Generates several original approaches, tests materials confidently, and increasingly uses feedback to improve a design.

Evidence reviewed

5 portfolio pieces · 2 process reviews · 1 exhibition · 3 reflections

May include: Creative portfolio · design-process artifacts · performance or exhibition · student reflection.
Next step

Document why each revision made the final work stronger.

At home

Ask: “What changed between your first idea and your final one?”

Student voice

“The part that failed showed me what to build next.”

How the 1–100 scale works

Developmental—not comparative.

A 77 is not 77% correct, a letter grade, an IQ score, or a percentile ranking. It describes the level a child consistently demonstrates on a defined developmental rubric.

1–20Emerging

The skill is beginning to appear with substantial support.

21–40Building

The child demonstrates parts of the skill with regular support.

41–60Practicing

The skill is becoming more consistent in familiar situations.

61–80Applying

The child uses the skill independently in multiple situations.

81–100Extending

The child transfers, adapts, and deepens the skill in new situations.

01Collect

Benchmarks, observations, portfolios, projects, and reflection create multiple evidence points.

02Calibrate

Educators compare evidence to shared age- and grade-specific rubric anchors for consistency.

03Explain

Families see the current score, change from baseline, supporting evidence, and plain-language meaning.

04Act

Every reporting cycle ends with a focused next step for the child, educator, and family.

Planned measurement framework for the 2027 pilot. Rubrics, evidence rules, and calibration protocols will be tested and refined before reporting live student results.

The focused launch

Start small enough to learn.
Strong enough to prove.

One Milwaukee pilot. Evidence before expansion.

75students
K4–2grades
4learning communities
of about 19
2027planned opening

Launch gate: confirm demand for all 75 seats before major fixed commitments.

Founding team

The team matches the model.

Community access meets deliberate school design.

JF

Jeremy Fojut

Partnerships + launch

Community · authorization · capital · enrollment

MH

Monica Hidalgo

Learning + school design

Learning model · educators · experience · measurement

The 2027 invitation

Build the first school.
Prove a better childhood.

We’re gathering the founding community of Milwaukee families, educators, partners, and supporters who want to help make this real.

75 studentsK4–2Milwaukee

Founding interest · not enrollment

Raise your hand.

Tell us how you’d like to be part of The Understory.

We’ll use this information only for Understory planning and updates.